Ng a vernier calliper (accuracy: 60.1 mm). Crayfish were kept for at least two weeks at the density of 15 m22 in plastic tanks (80660660 cm) containing clay pots in excess as shelter and at a natural light-dark cycle at room temperature (24uC). They were fed ad libitum with live Calliphora sp. larvae. Water was changed weekly.sterile 1 mL syringes fitted with 25 g needles. All the animals were bled between 0800 and 0900 h and left undisturbed for 2 h. The sample was preserved on ice for 5 min to avoid coagulation and then centrifuged at 12 0006 g for 2 min at 4uC to pellet the hemocytes. The supernatant was then collected. Glucose concentration (mg dL21) in the hemolymph was Dimethylenastron cost assessed using the glucose oxidase method of a commercial 18334597 kit (Hospitex Diagnostics).Criteria for Choosing Experimental CrayfishOnly hard-shelled, intact, and sexually mature males were used for the experiment. A total of 80 individuals (cephalothorax length: 47.560.6 mm) were thus selected: 20 for the extraction of cHH and 60 for behavioural observations. Since dominance increases with body size in crayfish [3], the experimental pairs of fighting males were size matched (maximum difference in cephalothorax length: 62 mm) to eliminate any factor that could induce an obvious bias to our experiments. Before the beginning of the experiment, crayfish were kept in isolation in opaque plastic aquaria (25615625 cm) for at least two weeks, which is a sufficient time to reset any previous social experience [35]. In no case did the crayfish meet each other prior to the experiment, so any effect of previous social experience can be excluded [36]. All crayfish were used only once to avoid pseudo-replication.Figure 1. RP-HPLC profile of the crude extract of sinus glands. Gracillin Mobile Phase A: 0.1 TFA in water. Mobile Phase B: 0.1 TFA in acetonitrile. Gradient: 0?00 B over 60 min at 1 mL min21. Column: Zorbax SB-C18 4.6 6 150 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050047.gAggression in Decapods Modulated by cHHFigure 2. Horizontal time sequence of experimental design. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050047.gPhase 2: Familiarization (T0). The two opponents were kept in an experimental aquarium (a circular opaque PVC container, diameter: 30 cm) separated by an opaque PVC divider for 10-min acclimatization. The familiarization started with the removal of the divider and lasted 20 min (T0), during which time crayfish behaviour was recorded by a digital camera (Samsung VP-L800) for subsequent blind analysis (see below). Simultaneously, an experienced observer (LA) recorded the winner of each fight so that, at the end 1407003 of familiarization, we could determine the dominant lpha crayfish (and consequently the subordinate eta crayfish) for each pair, that is, the winner (and the loser) of more than 60 of the total fights [40]. The `winner’ was defined as the crayfish that did not retreat or that retreated after the opponent showed a motionless posture, which is typical of a subordinate [4]. Trials where dominance was not clearly established were excluded from the analysis. A total of 26 (out of 30) size-matched pairs were observed and alpha and beta crayfish were assessed. Phase 3: Experimental treatments. The above selected pairs were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: (1) `control pairs’ (CP, n = 8): both males were injected with 100 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS); (2) `reinforced pairs’ (RP, n = 9): the alpha was injected with 100 mL of native cHH solution, and the beta with 10.Ng a vernier calliper (accuracy: 60.1 mm). Crayfish were kept for at least two weeks at the density of 15 m22 in plastic tanks (80660660 cm) containing clay pots in excess as shelter and at a natural light-dark cycle at room temperature (24uC). They were fed ad libitum with live Calliphora sp. larvae. Water was changed weekly.sterile 1 mL syringes fitted with 25 g needles. All the animals were bled between 0800 and 0900 h and left undisturbed for 2 h. The sample was preserved on ice for 5 min to avoid coagulation and then centrifuged at 12 0006 g for 2 min at 4uC to pellet the hemocytes. The supernatant was then collected. Glucose concentration (mg dL21) in the hemolymph was assessed using the glucose oxidase method of a commercial 18334597 kit (Hospitex Diagnostics).Criteria for Choosing Experimental CrayfishOnly hard-shelled, intact, and sexually mature males were used for the experiment. A total of 80 individuals (cephalothorax length: 47.560.6 mm) were thus selected: 20 for the extraction of cHH and 60 for behavioural observations. Since dominance increases with body size in crayfish [3], the experimental pairs of fighting males were size matched (maximum difference in cephalothorax length: 62 mm) to eliminate any factor that could induce an obvious bias to our experiments. Before the beginning of the experiment, crayfish were kept in isolation in opaque plastic aquaria (25615625 cm) for at least two weeks, which is a sufficient time to reset any previous social experience [35]. In no case did the crayfish meet each other prior to the experiment, so any effect of previous social experience can be excluded [36]. All crayfish were used only once to avoid pseudo-replication.Figure 1. RP-HPLC profile of the crude extract of sinus glands. Mobile Phase A: 0.1 TFA in water. Mobile Phase B: 0.1 TFA in acetonitrile. Gradient: 0?00 B over 60 min at 1 mL min21. Column: Zorbax SB-C18 4.6 6 150 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050047.gAggression in Decapods Modulated by cHHFigure 2. Horizontal time sequence of experimental design. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050047.gPhase 2: Familiarization (T0). The two opponents were kept in an experimental aquarium (a circular opaque PVC container, diameter: 30 cm) separated by an opaque PVC divider for 10-min acclimatization. The familiarization started with the removal of the divider and lasted 20 min (T0), during which time crayfish behaviour was recorded by a digital camera (Samsung VP-L800) for subsequent blind analysis (see below). Simultaneously, an experienced observer (LA) recorded the winner of each fight so that, at the end 1407003 of familiarization, we could determine the dominant lpha crayfish (and consequently the subordinate eta crayfish) for each pair, that is, the winner (and the loser) of more than 60 of the total fights [40]. The `winner’ was defined as the crayfish that did not retreat or that retreated after the opponent showed a motionless posture, which is typical of a subordinate [4]. Trials where dominance was not clearly established were excluded from the analysis. A total of 26 (out of 30) size-matched pairs were observed and alpha and beta crayfish were assessed. Phase 3: Experimental treatments. The above selected pairs were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: (1) `control pairs’ (CP, n = 8): both males were injected with 100 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS); (2) `reinforced pairs’ (RP, n = 9): the alpha was injected with 100 mL of native cHH solution, and the beta with 10.
