Of cultural institutions (facilities) per 100,000 people, andand employment inculcultural sphere (as a percentage of total employed). Sources: Author’s calculations based on tural sphere (as a percentage of total employed). Sources: Author’s calculations depending on Municipal Municipal Statistics, Federal State GS-626510 Technical Information Statistics Service of the Russian Federation (Rosstat), 2019 (newest Statistics, Federal State Statistics Service from the Russian Federation (Rosstat), 2019 (most recent offered out there data); Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye pokazateli 2019. Rosstat:Moscow, information); Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye pokazateli 2019. Rosstat:Moscow, 2019; 2gis.ru. 2019; 2gis.ru.three.four.1. Cultural Facilities in Naryan-Mar: Diversity inside the Monotony 3.3.1. Cultural Facilities in Naryan-Mar: Diversity inside the Monotony Regardless of a higher value for the 17.1 ISO indicator, not all cities’ cultural facilities meet BSJ-01-175 Inhibitor Despite a higher worth for the 17.1 ISO indicator, not all cities’ cultural facilities meet the expectations of distinct regional youth groups. Naryan-Mar includes a rather ethnically the expectations of different regional youth groups.share of Indigenous rather ethnically homogenous society having a reasonably considerable Naryan-Mar features a population and restricted cultural diversity policies: The cultural institutions are mostly folklore-oriented and function as fabrics for refining mainly Arctic Indigenous art and culture. As an illustration, under the umbrella from the budget-funded Culture Center “Arktika” and Ethnocultural Center, out of thirteen dance, choir, and theatrical studios with young men and women, only fourSustainability 2021, 13,15 ofare relevant to youth contemporary mainstream culture. The rest are folk-specific and, despite the fact that culturally diverse, restricted to Northern (like Russian) cultures only. Expanding ethnic groups (both new and well-established but small-numbered) are certainly not really effectively represented inside the cultural sphere. Regardless of officially registered Dagestani, Tatar-Bashkir, and Chuvash associations [81], and Azeri people’s visible presence, they’re not perceived as an integral “permanent” a part of the cultural and social fabric and as a result not equally displayed within the public cultural domain. Such a practice of selective cultural inclusion could also be influenced by the general public’s views in this area on diversity policies: A public survey carried out in 2019 revealed that only 53 of respondents believed that all residents of ethnically defined autonomies, such as NAO, have equal rights no matter their ethnic background; 37.5 expressed a robust belief that Indigenous Peoples are entitled to have a lot more rights in their ancestral homeland than other ethnicities; 9 didn’t have an opinion about this matter [81]. Functionalities of other city cultural institutions are somewhat narrow and oldfashioned and play a minimal function in young city dwellers’ each day lives. The Central Library of NAO in Naryan-Mar gives specific events and applications mainly oriented to youngsters and older adults. Nenets Regional Museum of Regional Lore has rich permanent collections and experienced tours led by historians and Indigenous researchers. However, they’re rather tourist-oriented and not a continual point of attraction for young locals. three.four.2. Cultural Facilities in YaNAO: Move towards a Higher Diversity In YaNAO, both focal cities with their more significant mobility patterns present “an ongoing progressive move from a Eurocentric culture toward higher hybridization” [82.
