Ng the northeast Pacific coast, we propose the emendation above with
Ng the northeast Pacific coast, we propose the emendation above with the designation of a neotype. The taxonomic status of Sternaspis affinis Stimpson, 864 demands clarification because it has been regarded as a junior synonym of a Northwestern Atlantic species, S. fossor Stimpson, 853, or from the Mediterranean species, S. scutata (Ranzani, 87). The proposal of a neotype together with all the above description and illustrations will clarify theKelly Sendall Sergio I. SalazarVallejo ZooKeys 286: 4 (203)existing scenario (ICZN 999, Art. 75.three.five.three.3). The original material was deposited in the Smithsonian and later transferred to Chicago when William Stimpson was appointed director in the regional Academy of Sciences in 866, however they were destroyed in 87 throughout the great Chicago fire (http:si.MedChemExpress Flumatinib eduoahpScientificIllustratorsWStimpson.html; ICZN 999, Art. 75.three.four). Regardless of the truth that the original description was brief, S. affinis appears to become the only species living within the sort locality area, and we’re confident that the neotype corresponds towards the species (ICZN 999, Art. 75.3.5). The proposed neotype was collected within the form locality (ICZN 999, Art. 75.3.6), and it has been PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12172973 deposited within the Royal British Columbia Museum (ICZN 999, Art. 75.three.7). Sternaspis affinis resembles S. fossor, S. maior and S. islandica as they all have shields with rounded anterior margins, lateral margins slightly rounded, and posterior margins reaching or slightly expanded beyond the posterolateral corners. Even so, S. islandica differs by getting an incredibly shallow anterior depression, whereas the two other species have deep anterior depressions. The remaining three species differ because in S. affinis and S. maior the radiating ribs and posterior corners are generally distinct, whereas they’re barely developed, or not at all in S. fossor. Hence, S. affinis is extremely equivalent to S. maior but their key distinction lies within the relative improvement of concentric lines which are distinct in S. affinis and not visible or barely visible in S. maior. Distribution. Alaska, USA (in the Gulf of Alaska) south along the coast and inland waters to Monterey, California, USA, and in to the Gulf of California. This species, identified as S. fossor, has been regarded as one of the most abundant ones along the coast in the East Sound on the San Juan Islands (Weese and Macnab 930), and along the Washington coast in 9554 m with sediment having 508 mud (Lie and Kisker 970). Moore (923:28) reported two species from Southern California, primarily based upon the number of chaetal fascicles along the shield margins; 1 with six total bundles discovered in 4492 m, along with the other, smaller in size, with five total bundles and collected in sediments at 9290 m. Sternaspis africana Augener, 98, stat. n. http:speciesid.netwikiSternaspis_africana Figure six Sternaspis fossor var. africana Augener, 98:6083, figs 090; Fauvel 950:342 (species list). Sternaspis fossor africana: Petersen 2000:32, Table .. Sternaspis scutata var. africana: Monro 930:7980; Tebble 955:3435; Kirkegaard 959:72; Guy 964:97; Intes and le Loeuff 977:234. Sternaspis scutata: Jeldes and Lefevere 959:32; Rullier 965:523, fig. (non Ranzani 87). Kind material. Neotype (NHM 930.0.eight.2582), R.V. Discovery Expedition, Angola, St. Paul 
Loanda, 087’S, 34’E, in 645 m, 4VIII927.Revision of Sternaspis Otto, 82 (Polychaeta, Sternaspidae)Figure 6. Sternaspis africana Augener, 98 n. status, neotype (NHM 930.0.eight.258290) A Anterior finish, ventral view B Posterior end, oblique lat.
