Ion. On the other hand, the solar radiation is calculated on the data from a meteorological year with out interreflections between surrounding surfaces. Hence, the total solar radiation incident on the analyzed concentrating PV method was calculated working with the Radiance engine. Subsequently, the Mefenpyr-diethyl MedChemExpress obtained result file was implemented in to the ESP-r model as a boundary situation within the kind of a temporal file. The remaining meteorological data, like air temperature, wind path and velocity, air stress and humidity have been assumed based on the exact same climate information as within the very first a part of the analysis.Energies 2021, 14,Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW13 of12 of2.two.4. Energy Overall performance Analysis the Selected Configuration of Panels 2.2.4. Power Overall performance Analysis for for the Selected Configuration of Panels The second the in the analysis was performed for three chosen PV panel The second component ofpart evaluation was performed for 3 chosen PV panel configuconfigurations of PVto the highest the highest total annual solar Diflubenzuron Inhibitor irradiance (case H), the rations of PV panels due panels because of total annual solar irradiance (case H), the highest highest enhance in total annual solar irradiance of PV panels with reflective surfaces boost in total annual solar irradiance of PV panels with reflective surfaces compared in comparison to the reference PV panels (case D), along with the optimal slope of PV panels for the for the reference PV panels (case D), as well as the optimal slope of PV panels for the whole year entire year (case G). (case G). Additionally, the application in the proposed concentrating PV technique is only Furthermore, the application in the proposed concentrating PV system is only reareasonable within the form of an installation consisting of a number of adjacent panels equipped sonable inside the type of an installation consisting of numerous adjacent panels equipped the with extremely reflective surfaces. For the goal of power performance calculations, with extremely authors assumed a single row of twelve vertically positioned PV panels equipped with reflective surfaces. For the goal of energy functionality calculations, the authors assumed a single row from the solar irradiance for the described installations arewith reflective reflective surfaces. twelve vertically positioned PV panels equipped presented in Table solar irradiance for located in the installations are presented in Table 9. nonsurfaces. The9. Reflective surfaces the described major and bottom of PV panels influence the Reflecuniform distribution leading and bottom with panels impact the non-uniform and reduce tive surfaces positioned at the of solar irradianceof PV the highest intensity within the upperdistribution components from the panel. the highest ESP-r calculations assumed lower components of of panel. of solar irradiance with For that reason, theintensity inside the upper andthe typical valuethe solar irradiance incident on PV panels. Solar irradiance was solar irradiance incident on Thus, the ESP-r calculations assumed the typical worth ofdetermined for each hour all through the whole PV panels. Solar irradianceyear. determined for each hour throughout the entire year. wasTable 9.vertically for D,of annualcases. irradiance for rows consisting of twelve PV panels positioned Distribution H and G solar vertically for D, H and G circumstances.Table 9. Distribution of annual solar irradiance for rows consisting of twelve PV panels positionedDDkWh/m2 kWh/mGGHH3. ResultsIn this section, the outcomes on the energy overall performance and tempera.
