In the sequence alignment shown in Lecirelin price figure 8. The STAT1 TAD undergoes coupled folding and binding to form one well defined helix in the complex, which, together with extended regions located on either side of the helix, fits into a hydrophobic groove on the surface of TAZ2. This groove is surrounded by a high proportion of positively charged and polar residues, which favours the binding of amphipathic helices and extended regions, such as those seen in the STAT1 TAD (figure 7D). As previously mentioned, the B-Myb TAD has the potential to fold upon binding to form two short amphipathic helices (a1 and a2). The second of these helices (a2) would contain a hydrophobic and an acidic face (figure 6), which would allow it to make complementary interactions with the interaction surface on TAZ2. It seems likely that this predicted helical region (a2), together with either the preceding predicted helix (a1), or the highly conserved acidic/ hydrophobic rich region located on the C-terminal side of B-Myb TAD a2 would bind TAZ2 in a similar manner to that seen by the STAT1 TAD (figure S1 and figure 7). This type of interaction would account for the observed shift in B-Myb TAD tryptophan fluorescence. Such an interaction would allow the non-polar residues of B-Myb TAD to make favourable van der Waals contacts with part of the hydrophobic groove in the interaction surface on TAZ2 (figure 7D), whilst the acidic B-Myb TAD side Lecirelin chains could make favourable hydrogen bond and ionic interactions with the basic side-chains of surrounding p300 TAZ2 residues, resulting in the formation of a relatively stable complex. The structures of TAZ2 in complex with the E1A conserved region 1 (CR1, residues 53?1) and the p53 TAD1 (residues 1?9) have also been solved and are shown in figure 7 [61], [64]. E1A CR1 also fits into a hydrophobic groove on the surface of TAZ2 forming a number of hydrophobic interactions, which are stabilised by complementary ionic interactions between acidic residues of E1A CR1 and surrounding basic residues of TAZ2. The C-terminal half of E1A CR1, binds to the same region of TAZ2 as the amphipathic helix of STAT1, and therefore partially overlaps with the B-Myb TAD interaction surface (figure 7). The p53 TAD1 binding site shows some overlap with 24195657 the B-Myb TAD interaction surface (figure 7), but this is to a much lesser extent than seen for the STAT1 TAD and E1A CR1, with the main BMyb TAD and p53 TAD1 interaction surfaces being located on opposite sides of TAZ2. The E1A CR1 has been shown to compete with the p53 TAD1 for binding to TAZ2 [61]. It seems very likely that the B-Myb TAD will also compete with the STAT1 TAD, E1A CR1 and possibly the p53 TAD1 for binding to TAZ2. Given the fact that p300 and CBP are present in limited amounts in cells competition between these transcriptional regulators may play an important role in transcriptional regulation. During the preparation of this manuscript the ternary structure of p300 TAZ2 in complex with DNA-bound MADS-box/MEF2 domain of MEF2 (residues 1?5) was reported [68]. The structure shows that three MEF2 dimers can simultaneously bind to distinctinteraction surfaces on TAZ2, as shown in figure S3. In contrast to the previously discussed TAZ2 binding partners, which are composed of short helical and extended regions that fit into hydrophobic grooves on the surface of TAZ2, each MEF2 dimer interacts with TAZ2 via two parallel helices, which bind discrete surfaces of TAZ2. In addition, no significa.In the sequence alignment shown in figure 8. The STAT1 TAD undergoes coupled folding and binding to form one well defined helix in the complex, which, together with extended regions located on either side of the helix, fits into a hydrophobic groove on the surface of TAZ2. This groove is surrounded by a high proportion of positively charged and polar residues, which favours the binding of amphipathic helices and extended regions, such as those seen in the STAT1 TAD (figure 7D). As previously mentioned, the B-Myb TAD has the potential to fold upon binding to form two short amphipathic helices (a1 and a2). The second of these helices (a2) would contain a hydrophobic and an acidic face (figure 6), which would allow it to make complementary interactions with the interaction surface on TAZ2. It seems likely that this predicted helical region (a2), together with either the preceding predicted helix (a1), or the highly conserved acidic/ hydrophobic rich region located on the C-terminal side of B-Myb TAD a2 would bind TAZ2 in a similar manner to that seen by the STAT1 TAD (figure S1 and figure 7). This type of interaction would account for the observed shift in B-Myb TAD tryptophan fluorescence. Such an interaction would allow the non-polar residues of B-Myb TAD to make favourable van der Waals contacts with part of the hydrophobic groove in the interaction surface on TAZ2 (figure 7D), whilst the acidic B-Myb TAD side chains could make favourable hydrogen bond and ionic interactions with the basic side-chains of surrounding p300 TAZ2 residues, resulting in the formation of a relatively stable complex. The structures of TAZ2 in complex with the E1A conserved region 1 (CR1, residues 53?1) and the p53 TAD1 (residues 1?9) have also been solved and are shown in figure 7 [61], [64]. E1A CR1 also fits into a hydrophobic groove on the surface of TAZ2 forming a number of hydrophobic interactions, which are stabilised by complementary ionic interactions between acidic residues of E1A CR1 and surrounding basic residues of TAZ2. The C-terminal half of E1A CR1, binds to the same region of TAZ2 as the amphipathic helix of STAT1, and therefore partially overlaps with the B-Myb TAD interaction surface (figure 7). The p53 TAD1 binding site shows some overlap with 24195657 the B-Myb TAD interaction surface (figure 7), but this is to a much lesser extent than seen for the STAT1 TAD and E1A CR1, with the main BMyb TAD and p53 TAD1 interaction surfaces being located on opposite sides of TAZ2. The E1A CR1 has been shown to compete with the p53 TAD1 for binding to TAZ2 [61]. It seems very likely that the B-Myb TAD will also compete with the STAT1 TAD, E1A CR1 and possibly the p53 TAD1 for binding to TAZ2. Given the fact that p300 and CBP are present in limited amounts in cells competition between these transcriptional regulators may play an important role in transcriptional regulation. During the preparation of this manuscript the ternary structure of p300 TAZ2 in complex with DNA-bound MADS-box/MEF2 domain of MEF2 (residues 1?5) was reported [68]. The structure shows that three MEF2 dimers can simultaneously bind to distinctinteraction surfaces on TAZ2, as shown in figure S3. In contrast to the previously discussed TAZ2 binding partners, which are composed of short helical and extended regions that fit into hydrophobic grooves on the surface of TAZ2, each MEF2 dimer interacts with TAZ2 via two parallel helices, which bind discrete surfaces of TAZ2. In addition, no significa.
